wife_material: (072)
wife_material ([personal profile] wife_material) wrote2023-11-04 05:07 pm

IC Inbox

leave a message
fragmentaryblue: (23)

[personal profile] fragmentaryblue 2024-02-09 02:37 am (UTC)(link)
[Well, he's being no help in determining his preferences, but at least she's gaining a bit of knowledge nonetheless. The picture that he paints is... chaotic? That might be the best word. Someone had aspirations, but the trajectory of their means sounds tawdry. A base variety sort of ambition. She's seen the type before.]

[Now she feels a little insulted.]


Well, that's quite the ghost to contend with. I certainly don't harbor any of those intentions, though I suppose it won't do much to simply say so.

[There's a notable delay in her texts, a brief pause of thought. Should she say more? He says that he doesn't see it and barely understands it, and she appreciates that candid assessment. But he's also borrowed this lunacy before. Perhaps it wouldn't hurt to put even that speculation to bed.]

You're right, though. I'm no subordinate of yours. I have no interest in power (whatever that should entail here), even less interest in men, and I find your willfulness to be one of your most endearing qualities. Frankly, and I hope you don't mind my forwardness-- I was expecting a little better from this ghost. They sound dreadfully common.

However... I can understand his concern. I hope they didn't cause you too much trouble.
fragmentaryblue: (19)

[personal profile] fragmentaryblue 2024-03-17 03:32 am (UTC)(link)
[The confirmation that the ghost is indeed a ghost-- not quite literal but not strictly metaphor-- is nice as well. At least tells her that the issue was dealt with in an acceptable manner. Not that it would be something to concern her, but it does feel like something that should be more easily put to rest for everyone that had been involved.]

[Why she's being compared to a dead woman is beyond her. Can't Li Lianhua just consider her a unique problem of his? It's so confining, being framed in someone else's shadow simply because ...what? She make a joke about his friend's intentions? Tch.]


I do understand now. I thank you for the explanation.

No need because the altercation has passed? Or because the lunacy has?
fragmentaryblue: (17)

[personal profile] fragmentaryblue 2024-04-16 06:09 pm (UTC)(link)
Alas. So much for promising no ill intentions when I next pretend to flirt with you.

[Which she will. Understanding the nature of Li Lianhua's concerns doesn't mean she's interested in curbing her own. It just gives her an idea on how to mitigate any feathers that she ruffles, how to side-step disputes that she doesn't feel like having, and that's good enough for her.]

Is it endearing, to have someone be so protective of you?
fragmentaryblue: (23)

[personal profile] fragmentaryblue 2024-04-19 07:27 pm (UTC)(link)
[Unfortunately, the playing dead does still make her smile. Such is life.]

If he were right about what? That I have some predatory interest in you? That I'm dangerous to you? This is a very silly hypothetical, and the idea of "targeting" anyone is beyond me.

But if I have to answer, then it would have to be him first, no? And if I did that, then I don't imagine you would like me very much, and my days would be very boring. So where would I even be?

See, it all falls apart the moment you take more than two seconds to think about. I'm a little insulted that I'm expected to be so devoid of reason.
fragmentaryblue: (19)

[personal profile] fragmentaryblue 2024-04-19 10:02 pm (UTC)(link)
Continued disbelief, not reassurance. The idea is so faulty as to be impressive on multiple levels. But I'll let it go for your sake.

I understand your point, though it didn't need to be made. My question was genuine. Do you enjoy his fussing over you?
fragmentaryblue: (14)

[personal profile] fragmentaryblue 2024-04-22 04:43 am (UTC)(link)
Is what I call it that important?

I can't tell you if you should enjoy it or not. That's up to you to determine.
fragmentaryblue: (14)

[personal profile] fragmentaryblue 2024-05-05 09:43 pm (UTC)(link)
I am, and I have not.

I could wax poetic all day about the nature between the two of you, but why should I? I'd much rather have your words than mine on the matter.
fragmentaryblue: (10)

[personal profile] fragmentaryblue 2024-05-06 05:58 am (UTC)(link)
Hmm, you make a compelling argument.

You're avoiding the question, though. Is it really so difficult to answer?
fragmentaryblue: (17)

[personal profile] fragmentaryblue 2024-05-13 11:14 pm (UTC)(link)
Alright, how do you see this conversation working, then?
fragmentaryblue: (01)

[personal profile] fragmentaryblue 2024-05-14 11:25 pm (UTC)(link)
I'm familiar, yes. I don't entirely mean to interrogate, but asking how to answer my question is hardly much of a conversation either. I gave you the answer that I had, which is to say that I didn't have one. I'm not in the habit of telling others how they should feel.

And it seems strange for you to want to hear what I think about two men who have known each other far longer than I've known them. Do you plan to grade me on my guesses? Measure how closely they hit their marks? I'll feel very silly if I'm wrong, but you don't seem to have any consideration for that.